Slaying or slaughtering of Dogs an Islamic Command? No it's NOT - A detailed study w/ Hadith proves

As a Muslims we believe that the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the standard of ethical excellence. I'm finding it very hard to believe that the holy Prophet would order that every one dogs be killed, simply because the angel Jibril (AS) never entered his home due to a dog. There's also no evidence that these general commands to kill dogs were just for harmful dogs. There’s also the subsequent hadith's that suggests that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) hated dogs:

Thus, Muslims do not hate dogs but we just do not keep them inside our homes nor as pets. So if we were to see a dog hungry or thirsty we should give it food and water, if we see it with an injured leg then we should try to fix its legs and so on. A dog has its value but its value is not above humans. We Muslims value humans above animals. “Abd Allah B. Mughaffal reported the apostle of Allah as saying: Were dogs not a species of creature I should command that all of them be killed; but kill every pure black one.” Can you please clarify this matter because it is making me very uncertain about my faith?

The Pinnacle of ethical Excellence

You are correct in saying that the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and provides him peace) is the standard of ethical excellence. In fact, he's its pinnacle, a bit like a functioning compass always points north, if morality, perfect conduct, and character were a compass, it might invariable post to the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and provides him peace). Time and time again we see that when he was faced with moral decisions which might have made great men buckle, he showed such great resolve and conduct that it overshadowed the best of deeds performed by others. Allah is that the source of morality and what's considered right or wrong. His Messenger (Allah bless him and provides him peace) is that the very embodiment of revelation from Allah. ʿĀʾisha RA said that ‘His conduct had always been the Qurʾan’ (Bukhari). many folks bump into narrations about the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and provides him peace) which they're uncomfortable with. What has been observed time and time again is that either these narrations don't seem to be authentic, or, that they need been de-contextualised, misunderstood or both. If it does happen that there's a narration one feels uncomfortable with, then one should remain calm and not feel that their faith is on the road. After seeing many such scenarios, I can say that after a correct understanding is reached, people feel comfortable with what was chafing at them earlier.

Dogs:

Before progressing, it's important to clarify which type of dogs are spoken within the hadith. most of the people, when reading these narrations, imagine cute puppies with big eyes, so feel pitying them. The dogs named here don't seem to be of that sort. In most Western countries packs of untamed dogs don't wonder around towns and cities unchecked. this can be the case though in many places there was a pack of stray dogs which wondered round the town after dark, and rummaged around in rubbish bins. Dogs like there are a nuisance to a community and a health risk. They carry and spread illnesses, rather like rats do, and cause lots of inconvenience to people. The killing of dangerous animals, or disease spreading animals – or Animal Euthanasia, as we check with it within the West – is common and accepted throughout the planet.

Some of these wild dogs will be taken in as puppies and trained for tasks like hunting, guarding, and used as sheep-dogs. Others are vicious, dangerous and a nuisance to people.

I also think it's important to deal with the statement that the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) hated dogs. this is often incorrect. As we shall see there are variety of narrations within which He mentioned that individuals who had shown kindness to dogs were forgiven and rewarded by Allah. In fact, whilst on a military campaign to Makkah, PBUH elapsed a bitch laying in their path together with her pups suckling from her, to stop her from being harmed he ordered Juʿayl b. Suraqa to protect her lest any of the oncoming army disturb or harm them (Imtāʿ al-Asmāʿ, al-Muqrizi). is that this the action of somebody who hated dogs? What’s more is that his grandson Hasan had a puppy, which he left under a bed within the house of the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace), which caused the angel Jibril to not enter (Abu Dawud).

Killing Dogs in Madina

To add to the explanations mentioned earlier, the saliva of dogs in impure as per the bulk of students, as in their fur in keeping with some. one among-st the foremost prominent teachings of Islam is purity on all levels, so this was a consideration, as was the very fact that angels don't frequent an area where there are dogs. Medina was a hub for revelation at that point, and also the knowledge the angel Jibril brought was vital to the developing religion and community. For the above reasons a command to kill the dogs of Medina was initially given, but it absolutely was never intended as a permanent ruling, nor as something to be applied everywhere. It seems, however, that a number of the companions may have gotten a touch frantic with this, and also the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) failed to want a whole species to be killed so he forbade the killing of dogs with the exception of black dogs. The proof that the ruling wasn't meant to the ever-present, nor permanent, is that the verse which allows hunting with dogs and other animals (5:4). How could hunting with dogs be possible if all dogs had been killed?Later, he said, ‘What is that the matter with them (the Companions) and also the dogs?’ This was at the purpose once they even killed the dog of a bedouin lady who came to Medina with it. He then ordered that only the black dogs should be killed, and later the command was restricted to harmful dogs (al-Nawawī, Sharh Sahih Muslim).

Once again, the context of the hadith should be borne in mind when trying to grasp it. The black dogs stated a selected set of dogs, and within the Arabic the ‘shayṭān’, devil, may be wont to consult with anything which is rebellious and unruly. This must are a top quality of that individual breed which made them dangerous. Later, the ruling was changed to only people who were actually like that. All of the above contextualises the opposite narration of Abdullah b. Mughaffal ‘Had dogs not been a species amongst the opposite species i might have commanded that all of them be killed, so just kill the soot black ones from them.’ (Muslim). The hadith maste,r Abu Sulaymān al-Khaṭṭābī, said that that this narration means he didn't want to kill all dogs because they were similar to the other species in this they were created with a wisdom and purpose. Every species searches for food, drink, and therefore the means to preserve itself, and so, he disliked killing all of them. (Mawsūʿa bayān al-Islam).In this may be a recognition of the worth of life, but also of the potential harms they may cause.

Washing Utensils The majority of jurists took the position that a utensil licked by a dog should be washed seven times, once with rubbing soil on that. In recent times, a university in Lebanon found that there are certain styles of bacteria found the in saliva of some dogs which is just completely removed with soil. during this may be a sign for people that reflect. (Yusuf al-Hāj Ahmad, Mawsū’a al-iʿjāz al-Ilmī), The Hanafi’s maintain that the standard rules of purification within the shariʿa apply here too, which the seven washes are a recommendation. Abu Hurayra told people to scrub such utensils seven times occasionally, and thrice infrequently, which indicates that the quantity could be a recommendation. (ʿItr, Iʿlam al-Anaam).

Conclusion It is clear from the above the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) didn't hate dogs, nor were any of his command contrary to the high standard of ethical excellence that he(PBUH) was the top of. There are many hadith praising the actions praising the actions of individuals who helped animals, a bit like there are those which threaten those that harm animals.

‘A Prostitute, walking with extreme thirst, descended into a well, drank from it, and came out. She saw a dog eating a soil because of extreme thirst, and said, ‘This dog is experiencing what i used to be just probing.’ He then filled his shoe with water, held it along with his teeth, climbed out, and let the dog drink from it. Allah thanked her and forgave her.’ The companions asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, are we rewarded for animals?’ He said, ‘In every living being there's a gift.’ (Bukharī).

In another narration the identical reward was given to a prostitute who found herself within the same situation. Conversely, there a narrations which state that w woman will enter hell because she pledged a cat; not feeding it herself, not allowing it to forage for its own food.(Bukhari). He even cursed those who branded the faces of animals. The jurists are very clear on the actual fact that one must save the lives of certain animals – dogs being amongst them – whether or not it means spending one’s money thereon.

The hadith of ʿAbdullah b. Mughaffal states that "The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace) ordered that the dogs be killed - The Devil and the Seeing-Eye Dog A recent story reveals the interesting history of dogs in Islamic tradition".

I hope that your concerns are alleviated after this explanation. Everything from Allah and His Messenger is ideal. Sometimes we don't see it thanks to not having the total details, or thanks to the cultural baggage or burden we have. May Allah show us the trust because truth and permit us to follow it assiduously, and me He shows what it wrong is wrong. May Allah bless you with the simplest of both worlds! #yusufbhandarkar Email: multimediastudio9.net